A new approach to the challenges surrounding artificial intelligence that argues for assessing AI actions as if they came from a human being
Every day we are confronted with ethical challenges arising from machine-mediated decision-making. Is the facial recognition software used by an agency fair? When algorithms determine questions of justice, finance, health, and defense, are the decisions proportionate, equitable, transparent, and accountable? How do we harness technology to empower rather than oppress?
Nigel Shadbolt and Roger Hampson argue that we can avert a disastrous and amoral future by assessing artificial-intelligence decisions, products, and calls for action as if they came from a human being. The authors go beyond the headlines about rampant robots to apply established moral principles, setting out seven “proverbs” for shaping this
● A thing should say what it is and be what it says.
● Artificial intelligences should show respect for human beings.
● Artificial intelligences are ethical only if they embody the best human values.
● Artificial intelligences should be transparent and accountable to humans.
● Humans have a right to be judged by humans if they so wish.
● Decisions that affect a lot of humans should involve a lot of humans.
● The future of humanity must not be decided in private by vested interests.
OpenCourser helps millions of learners each year. People visit us to learn workspace skills, ace their exams, and nurture their curiosity.
Our extensive catalog contains over 50,000 courses and twice as many books. Browse by search, by topic, or even by career interests. We'll match you to the right resources quickly.
Find this site helpful? Tell a friend about us.
We're supported by our community of learners. When you purchase or subscribe to courses and programs or purchase books, we may earn a commission from our partners.
Your purchases help us maintain our catalog and keep our servers humming without ads.
Thank you for supporting OpenCourser.