Judicial review is the power of a court to declare a law unconstitutional. It is a fundamental component of the American system of government, and it ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. Judicial review was first established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), in which the Supreme Court declared that it had the power to determine whether a law was constitutional.
History of Judicial Review
The concept of judicial review has its roots in the English common law tradition. In the early days of the American Republic, the federal courts were reluctant to exercise the power of judicial review. However, the Supreme Court gradually expanded its power over time, and by the early 20th century, it had become a well-established principle of American law.
The Process of Judicial Review
When a court conducts a judicial review, it examines the law in question to determine whether it violates the Constitution. The court will first consider the plain meaning of the law. If the law is clear and unambiguous, the court will apply it as written. However, if the law is ambiguous, the court will consider the legislative history of the law to determine the intent of the legislature. The court will also consider the precedents set by previous court decisions.
If the court finds that the law violates the Constitution, it will declare the law unconstitutional. The court will then order the government to stop enforcing the law. Judicial review is a powerful tool that can be used to protect the rights of individuals and ensure that the government acts in accordance with the Constitution.
The Importance of Judicial Review
Judicial review is an essential part of the American system of government. It ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. It also protects the rights of individuals and ensures that the government acts in accordance with the law.
Criticisms of Judicial Review
Judicial review has been criticized on a number of grounds. Some critics argue that it is undemocratic, as it allows unelected judges to overturn the will of the people. Others argue that it is too powerful, as it allows judges to strike down laws that they simply do not like. Still others argue that it is ineffective, as it does not always prevent the government from violating the Constitution.
Conclusion
Judicial review is a complex and controversial issue. However, it is an essential part of the American system of government. It ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. It also protects the rights of individuals and ensures that the government acts in accordance with the law.
Find a path to becoming a Judicial Review. Learn more at:
OpenCourser.com/topic/vaqpy2/judicial
Reading list
We've selected nine books
that we think will supplement your
learning. Use these to
develop background knowledge, enrich your coursework, and gain a
deeper understanding of the topics covered in
Judicial Review.
Provides a comprehensive overview of judicial review, exploring its history, theories, and practice in a variety of jurisdictions. It is particularly relevant for understanding the role of courts in constitutional systems and the limits of judicial power.
This classic work analyzes the role of judicial review in the United Kingdom and its importance for the maintenance of the rule of law. It foundational text for understanding the development of judicial review and its significance in constitutional systems.
Provides a comprehensive overview of constitutional justice in Russia, including the role of judicial review in protecting constitutional rights and ensuring the rule of law. It is particularly relevant for understanding the development of judicial review in Russia and its significance in the Russian legal system.
Examines the challenges and opportunities facing judicial review in the 21st century, including the rise of new technologies, the globalization of law, and the increasing politicization of courts. It is helpful for understanding the future of judicial review and its role in protecting individual rights and ensuring the rule of law.
Provides a comprehensive overview of constitutional law, including a significant focus on judicial review. It valuable resource for understanding the legal principles and doctrines that govern judicial review and the role of courts in protecting constitutional rights.
Explores the political dimensions of judicial review, examining the ways in which political factors influence the exercise of judicial power. It is helpful for understanding the role of courts in the political process and the potential for judicial review to be used as a tool of political power.
Examines the judicial review of legislation in a comparative context, analyzing the different approaches of different countries to the review of laws passed by legislatures. It is relevant for understanding the role of courts in ensuring the constitutionality of legislation and the limits of judicial power.
Explores the attitudinal model of judicial decision-making, which argues that the personal attitudes and beliefs of judges play a significant role in their decisions. It is relevant for understanding the potential for judicial review to be influenced by political or ideological factors.
Explores the concept of judicial activism and its implications for constitutionalism. It is relevant for understanding the role of courts in interpreting and enforcing constitutions and the potential for judicial power to be used to advance political or ideological agendas.
For more information about how these books relate to this course, visit:
OpenCourser.com/topic/vaqpy2/judicial
Save
