We may earn an affiliate commission when you visit our partners.

Judicial Review

Save

Judicial review is the power of a court to declare a law unconstitutional. It is a fundamental component of the American system of government, and it ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. Judicial review was first established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), in which the Supreme Court declared that it had the power to determine whether a law was constitutional.

History of Judicial Review

The concept of judicial review has its roots in the English common law tradition. In the early days of the American Republic, the federal courts were reluctant to exercise the power of judicial review. However, the Supreme Court gradually expanded its power over time, and by the early 20th century, it had become a well-established principle of American law.

The Process of Judicial Review

When a court conducts a judicial review, it examines the law in question to determine whether it violates the Constitution. The court will first consider the plain meaning of the law. If the law is clear and unambiguous, the court will apply it as written. However, if the law is ambiguous, the court will consider the legislative history of the law to determine the intent of the legislature. The court will also consider the precedents set by previous court decisions.

Read more

Judicial review is the power of a court to declare a law unconstitutional. It is a fundamental component of the American system of government, and it ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. Judicial review was first established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), in which the Supreme Court declared that it had the power to determine whether a law was constitutional.

History of Judicial Review

The concept of judicial review has its roots in the English common law tradition. In the early days of the American Republic, the federal courts were reluctant to exercise the power of judicial review. However, the Supreme Court gradually expanded its power over time, and by the early 20th century, it had become a well-established principle of American law.

The Process of Judicial Review

When a court conducts a judicial review, it examines the law in question to determine whether it violates the Constitution. The court will first consider the plain meaning of the law. If the law is clear and unambiguous, the court will apply it as written. However, if the law is ambiguous, the court will consider the legislative history of the law to determine the intent of the legislature. The court will also consider the precedents set by previous court decisions.

If the court finds that the law violates the Constitution, it will declare the law unconstitutional. The court will then order the government to stop enforcing the law. Judicial review is a powerful tool that can be used to protect the rights of individuals and ensure that the government acts in accordance with the Constitution.

The Importance of Judicial Review

Judicial review is an essential part of the American system of government. It ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. It also protects the rights of individuals and ensures that the government acts in accordance with the law.

Criticisms of Judicial Review

Judicial review has been criticized on a number of grounds. Some critics argue that it is undemocratic, as it allows unelected judges to overturn the will of the people. Others argue that it is too powerful, as it allows judges to strike down laws that they simply do not like. Still others argue that it is ineffective, as it does not always prevent the government from violating the Constitution.

Conclusion

Judicial review is a complex and controversial issue. However, it is an essential part of the American system of government. It ensures that the laws passed by the legislative branch are in accordance with the Constitution. It also protects the rights of individuals and ensures that the government acts in accordance with the law.

Share

Help others find this page about Judicial Review: by sharing it with your friends and followers:

Reading list

We've selected nine books that we think will supplement your learning. Use these to develop background knowledge, enrich your coursework, and gain a deeper understanding of the topics covered in Judicial Review.
Provides a comprehensive overview of judicial review, exploring its history, theories, and practice in a variety of jurisdictions. It is particularly relevant for understanding the role of courts in constitutional systems and the limits of judicial power.
Provides a comprehensive overview of constitutional justice in Russia, including the role of judicial review in protecting constitutional rights and ensuring the rule of law. It is particularly relevant for understanding the development of judicial review in Russia and its significance in the Russian legal system.
Examines the challenges and opportunities facing judicial review in the 21st century, including the rise of new technologies, the globalization of law, and the increasing politicization of courts. It is helpful for understanding the future of judicial review and its role in protecting individual rights and ensuring the rule of law.
Explores the political dimensions of judicial review, examining the ways in which political factors influence the exercise of judicial power. It is helpful for understanding the role of courts in the political process and the potential for judicial review to be used as a tool of political power.
Examines the judicial review of legislation in a comparative context, analyzing the different approaches of different countries to the review of laws passed by legislatures. It is relevant for understanding the role of courts in ensuring the constitutionality of legislation and the limits of judicial power.
Explores the attitudinal model of judicial decision-making, which argues that the personal attitudes and beliefs of judges play a significant role in their decisions. It is relevant for understanding the potential for judicial review to be influenced by political or ideological factors.
Explores the concept of judicial activism and its implications for constitutionalism. It is relevant for understanding the role of courts in interpreting and enforcing constitutions and the potential for judicial power to be used to advance political or ideological agendas.
Our mission

OpenCourser helps millions of learners each year. People visit us to learn workspace skills, ace their exams, and nurture their curiosity.

Our extensive catalog contains over 50,000 courses and twice as many books. Browse by search, by topic, or even by career interests. We'll match you to the right resources quickly.

Find this site helpful? Tell a friend about us.

Affiliate disclosure

We're supported by our community of learners. When you purchase or subscribe to courses and programs or purchase books, we may earn a commission from our partners.

Your purchases help us maintain our catalog and keep our servers humming without ads.

Thank you for supporting OpenCourser.

© 2016 - 2024 OpenCourser